Two of Sprig's most useful powers go beyond a normal answer: researching a topic in depth, and checking whether what's on a page is actually true. Both need a provider with web search (Claude, Grok, Gemini, or OpenAI).
Deep Dive
When a quick page isn't enough, Deep Dive turns Sprig into a researcher. It searches the web from several angles, reads the most important sources, and composes a long, structured report ā an executive summary, a table of contents, sections with headings, comparison tables, and inline citations.
Reach for Deep Dive on questions like:
- "Deep dive on the state of solid-state batteries in 2026."
- "Give me a thorough buyer's guide to standing desks under $500."
It takes longer than a normal compose because Sprig is genuinely reading sources ā the payoff is a report you can trust and cite.
Verify
Every composed page shows where its facts came from, but you can also ask Sprig to check whether they're true. Hit ā Verify and Sprig picks the three to five claims the page actually rests on ā the figures, dates and current statuses where being wrong would change what you do ā checks each against the live web, and marks the verdict on the page itself:
- ā Verified ā independent sources agree
- āļø Contested ā credible sources genuinely disagree
- ā Unverified ā no sourcing found either way (which is not the same as false)
- ā False ā sources clearly contradict it
Hover a mark to see what Sprig found. The full list ā every claim, what it found, and the source it checked ā sits at the top of the Sources panel.
Two things worth knowing:
- A claim Sprig isn't sure about is marked ā, never ā . A page marked verified that wasn't properly checked would be worse than an unmarked page.
- Not every claim gets a mark on the page. To put a verdict next to a sentence, Sprig has to match that sentence exactly, and sometimes the wording runs through bold or a link in a way that can't be anchored cleanly. Those claims still appear in the Sources panel ā they just don't get a badge.
Verify is especially handy after Sprig composes a page from its own knowledge (the Sources panel will say so) ā one click confirms it against the real web.
The full Trust Check
For the wider version ā every factual claim on the page, as its own report ā open the Sources panel and choose āļø Run a full trust check. Sprig fact-checks the whole page against reputable, independent sources and composes a separate Trust Check page, with a verdict, a one-line basis and a source link for each claim. It flags anything that reads as misinformation, propaganda, outdated-as-current, or single-sourced, and ends with a list of everything it checked.
Reach for it when a verdict on the page makes you want to look wider ā it's the escalation from a quick check, not a replacement for it.
When sources disagree
Sprig doesn't only flag disagreement when you ask it to. Any composed page will show you where its sources conflict: if the pages Sprig read give materially different answers on something that matters ā a price, a date, a measured figure ā it won't quietly pick one or split the difference.
Instead you get both positions on the page, each with the source that makes it, and a line on which is more credible or whether the question is genuinely unsettled. If the difference is really about staleness, Sprig says so and gives you each source's date.
A page with a conflict shows a āļø on the Sources button, and lists the contested points at the top of the Sources panel.
This is deliberately uncommon. Most pages have no genuine conflict, and Sprig is instructed never to stretch a wording difference into a disagreement or use it for a matter of taste ā so when you see one, it means something.